Legal: GML denies 2011 agreement with GoG, participated in Govenrment trips, page-26

I already noted your response, nro, that it apparently you don't consider it as a problem,

Noooope. IM asking for specifics of what you feel the problems are. But you dont seem to be able to say what they are. Please answer my posts above and then I can ascertain if there is a problem and information you claim is missing actually is.
Simple.

2) The major question is that why should Greenland participitate in such processwhen the EIA sucksand the project is hardly acceptable under EU law (as explained in the EIA thread).

Well show us where it sucks first and then when we determine it does. Lets go to the next step. But so far neither of you can supply specifics or explain why the aithorties accepted it in its entirity and to conform to the necessary legislation and practices. But yet you feel they are all wrong somehow and you know of something they didnt know. But yet cant tell us what that is.
So lets try again here.
Be specific.