Hmmm, could be that I'm confused about the differene between a NTMA being filed or registered. However, it does say on AGS's legal update that the NTMA was "terminated", indicating that it was accepted at some point (ie. before AGS lauched a challenge). Anyway, I'm just making the point that there's no way a NTMA filed in joint names precludes AGS continuing with the M&DC case. If the court awarded AGS 100% then the NTMA would just be amended or resubmitted.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- legal proceedings update
legal proceedings update, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 259 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)