Share
48,922 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 652
clock Created with Sketch. 06/09/24
13:17
Share
Originally posted by Reaper11:
↑
Or maybe when he lodged a defamation action about a program in which he wasn't named, the content of which was superceded by him having been criminally charged and which related to a workplace and profession with which he was no longer involved, the court should have looked at it and said there's no case to hear. On the very first day when he presented the basis of his defamation action. That way Lehrmann would not have incurred the costs he has, and neither would those defending the action. This area of law seems an awful lot more concerned with the financial windfalls available to the legal fraternity than the welfare of anyone who's a party to the proceedings.
Expand
such a disorganised, irrational and impulsive person, as Lehrmann has shown himself to be, was once an "advisor" to Lib Ministers. just shows the integrity of staffer selection.
