The whole debacle portrays the media in a frothing at the mouth desperate, dumb entity that will do anything for a story.......even if that story has zero physical or scientific evidence behind it as shown with the Higgins claims along with Channel 7 allegedly providing Lehrmann with coke, hookers, booze, free rent, etc for his side of the story(not sure what that former Channel 7 executives motives are but he sure portrayed the media in a bad light as much as the interview prep meeting with Britts, Sharaz, Wilko and the Channel 10 executive did as they all passed around the dim sims).
Wilko now popping her head up with an article in the SMH talking about how Britt's potential book negotiated by hubby Fitz detailed all the debauchery going on with the Canberra crowd(assume it's considered fiction based on the authors history of making up stories)
Once Sharaz got involved and dragged Wilkinson and Channel 10 into it the circus began in earnest with Sharaz playing the ring leader playing all of the media and political types as suckers and fools.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation decision Tuesday
Lehrmann defamation decision Tuesday, page-234
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 265 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)