“Disproved points”? It was not “points”, it was third party independent witness evidence that was never tested and fancifully dismissed by the DPP. This DPP was later found to have hidden, distorted and dismissed valid evidence that did not suit his narrative, and fabricated evidence presumably to achieve a conviction. This DPP was later sacked because of this wrong doing. So, you are wrong to think that evidence has been “dismissed”. It is still valid and is still out there waiting for a Royal Commission
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation decision Tuesday
“Disproved points”? It was not “points”, it was third party...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online