”If I form the view that Mr Lehrmann is a man whose credit has been so impugned that I’d be unwilling to accept anything he said, unless it’s corroborated by a witness whose evidence I accept, or contemporaneous material, why would it be appropriate for me to get into this somewhat … how can I put it, sordid… [evidence]?
”“I am reluctant to go down paths which I don’t need to go.”
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation decision Tuesday
Lehrmann defamation decision Tuesday, page-222
- There are more pages in this discussion • 277 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)