Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I am not disagreeing with you. Just stating a fact.There may be...

First 18 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
AmbrosePethick

16,883 Posts.

15/04/24

11:19

Post #: 73346584
Share

Originally posted by Reaper11: ↑

Yes, when you have a judge giving a verdict they talk for 5 hours then tell you the verdict. They could tell you the verdict first, then explain it over the next 5 hours. To an empty room. When a jury gives a verdict, it's no less important, but they just tell you the verdict without any explanation. Indicating you don't actually need the 5 hour explanation

Reaper.

Expand

I am not disagreeing with you. Just stating a fact.

There may be a precedent in law as to why it is done in this type (non criminal) of proceedings.
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 633 more messages in this thread...

First 18 Last