He could have made a case either way.
He dismissed some evidence of one party and made inferences after that and he could just as readily have done the same to the other party.
I respect the learned members opinion while thinking that he could have more readily said that neither persons version could be supported as there were too many falsehoods from both of them.
He could have made a case either way. He dismissed some evidence...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 427 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)