Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-351

First 351 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
beefarmer

14,695 Posts.

1366

15/04/24

21:45

Post #: 73357342
Share

Originally posted by pugsley100: ↑

So, we have to assume Higgins took her own clothes off

4:20am, Ms Anderson: the female security guard does a welfare check.

She opened the door to the Minister’s office and then saw Ms Higgins lying on her back on the couch in a state of undress such that she saw Ms Higgins’ vagina and Ms Higgins’ knees were up and slightly apart.
Ms Higgins opened her eyes and looked at Ms Anderson but then proceeded to roll into the foetal position
....................
When it comes to the dress, I accept the evidence of Ms Anderson, who encountered her about two hours later. It is unclear to me whether the dress had been completely removed prior to the sexual act, or during it, or had just been scrunched around the waist of Ms Higgins (thus exposing her breasts and genitalia).
If it was the latter, then I think it is likely the dress was taken off by Ms Higgins at some time prior to the arrival of Ms Anderson, despite her not being fully aware of her surroundings, presumably to allow her to be unencumbered by it while sleeping.

Expand

I wonder what Sacha baron cohen would have made of all of this va geena talk.
It looked at me like a bearded clam she uttered, and winked as well.
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 300 more messages in this thread...

First 351 Last

SPONSORED BY