"Lerhmann has no grounds for appeal"
You are wrong there, as I have explained above.
You are also wrong about Lehrmann taking Higgins dress off. I challenge you to take a dress (and underclothes) off an 80kg "log" without damaging it?
Besides, no one has ever claimed that Lehrmann took her clothes off. .
The issue of how and why Higgins became naked implies consent, because that is not something you normally do at the office unless you are intent on having sex.
Its as simple as that, and therefore the judge is wrong.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today
"Lerhmann has no grounds for appeal"You are wrong there, as I...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 294 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online