Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Well, lets wait and see. The judge was damming of both sides and...

First 367 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kacy

11,614 Posts.

514

15/04/24

22:23

Post #: 73357677
Share

Originally posted by moondoong: ↑

I'll be surprised if there is an appeal either.

Costs have to be determined and awarded.

An appeal would require more money put up in trust before proceeding.

I can't see Lehrmann having the money to continue, even if his lawyers went pro bono you have to potentially cover the other sides costs.

I think this part of the saga is now over.

Is the Reynolds vs Higgins/Sharaz defamation trial the next cab off the rank?

That's going to be a very interesting case imo.

Expand

Well, lets wait and see. The judge was damming of both sides and Wilkins. That sounds to me like both sides are at fault so both pay their own costs. Luhrmann has nothing to lose by appealing and everything to win.

Last edited by kacy: 15/04/24
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 284 more messages in this thread...

First 367 Last