Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-388

no you didn’t want him to explain. You said you thought he’s got it wrong. On more than one occasion. And you’ve said he was an idiot

i suggest you read what was said because you are misquoting - at no time did he conclude she was like a log and every time it is mentioned he does so on the basis he is referencing her words

I am presuming you are using only the summaries of the case written by different media outlets. It’s worth reading the actual findings you know. it’s very long ! but if you are going to judge him you really should make sure you know what you are talking about