Share
11,738 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 10
clock Created with Sketch.
26/04/24
13:05
Share
Originally posted by nippy:
↑
I have already addressed the 1 judge versus a jury issue. Each still needs to form a view either way or in-between. Anyone can look up the perceived issues with each type as well as the perceived advantages. I already said I prefer the 1 judge way, so no one is running away. It is all in your head. YOU Parsifal are running away from giving me a better explanation for Brittany's behaviours > 1) lying to the police about doctors evidence. 2) recanting same after press coverage and police investigation were well underway. 3) faking leg bruising evidence 4) prior claims of wanting a sex scandal on a low evidence requirement basis If it's good for the Bruce its good for the slander. ( apologies to the goose and gander ) Traumatized rape victims simply don't make up claims of having acquired false documentary evidence from third parties like a doctor. No one has provided a better explanation then this just being one lie of many from a scammer. This goes doubly so given the faked leg bruise evidence.
Expand
Nippy our judicial system does not allow a Jury in a defamation case such as this. It was always going to be a judge only trial and verdict. It's been done and the decision has been made and zero talk of an appeal. If you see yourself as a budding Judge then go to uni and get a degree in Law.