Lehrmann facing 'millions' in costs

Originally posted by Parsifal: ↑

you can tag me as you like because guess what - you are now trying to gas light me because I wont play ball. You may be used to writing the rules with the women who fall into your life but you don’t right the rules for me or for hotcopper. I don’t respond to your questions because they are not relevant nor that someone who has a far better grip on the law has made a judgement That’s not avoidance it’s common sense

if you didn’t mean judge or jury you shouldn’t have referred to it. Your problem is that is you are trying to wriggle out of it. Tough. It was there in black and white.

since the learned judge wrote nearly 400 pages you should try sending him a note about verbosity. See what he thinks. Of course some simple minds like to avoid complexity and use a range of methods to try to excuse their inability to absorb or process information.

and clearly the fact that you continue to believe you have discussed only legalities and not your opinion I’d suggest your processing power is far less than you think and you have little self awareness. Btw saying people are scum bags is an opinion.

your posts are almost completely opinion - from the moment you started writing about the lehrmann case. You are short on facts. but then not surprising since

oh btw my life is actually perfectly satisfactory thanks. What have you done of interest

Expand

You are a laugh!

I have said they are both scum bags which is an opinion of them but not an opinion of what the legal decision should have actually been.

I also asked for a better explanation from you of the Brittany actions I mentioned. I was open to what you said but you chose to run away instead. Uncomfortable for you hey when you could offer nothing....

Have already said jury or judge is irrelevant to the final decision made once that is done other than different possible appeal rights. How many more times do you need this to be said? You prefer to obfuscate and talk about anything other than what I asked.

On verbosity you could simply have used the MythBusters quote of "I reject your reality and substitute my own" rather than your digression into life in general.

Glad to hear your life is going fine. You like to accuse me of misogyny when in reality I sacrificed my own early career to maximize my fiancées before tragedy struck and I ended up alone. Just about as far away from being a misogynist as you can possibly get so there is something for you to think about.

What else do you have radically wrong?

This is partly why I have a background in both Science and Law and have lived a rich life.