Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

wrong again prof. You've chosen to mischaracterise because it's...

First 86 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bellcurve

9,170 Posts.

506

20/04/24

18:28

Post #: 73439891
Share

Originally posted by street professor: ↑

Ultimately there is only one person who has found in all "probabilities" that Higgins was raped, there still is no physical or scientific evidence that any sex let alone a rape took place on the night Higgins claimed "she was drunk as she ever was" but clearly remembered the details of waking up to find Bruce having sex with her.

Lee stated that both Lehrmann and Higgins were poor witnesses(liars), at the end of the day Lee found the Higgin's lies a bit more believable than Lehrmann's. He may be right in his judgement or he may be wrong, it's the opinion of one person.

Expand

wrong again prof. You've chosen to mischaracterise because it's convenient for you to do so for your own junior school narrative.

it was the considered judgment of Justice Michael Lee in Lehrmann's failed defamation case heard in the Federal Court.

the ease with which you flip this away suggests you barely graduated from kindy.
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...

First 86 Last