I respect the angle you are trying to represent. I am seeing that the world that doesn't believe in order and systems do not believe in sovereignty. This order and process also dictates fairness, in my view as I see it. The wall will not stop them from seeing their family and friends, they can still do this legally. The equal world you are trying to create will render my passport useless. Will this be practical in reality.
With regard to Aconex, if the company that wins the contract from the US government happens to use Aconex, it is a long bow to draw to rate Aconex as an unethical investment because of this. I mean where does it end? Does Aconex put a clause in its enterprise agreements that says, "Out software cannot be used for mining projects, casinos, banks, military bases, non-renewable energy, animal agriculture ......walls on borders.... etc." I mean where does it end? This world is damaged. I respect your view and I try to be neutral on most matters, albeit privileged as you suggest. Not in spite of hard work, remembering I grew up in Berlin during the wall saga.
Expand
