The proceedings began with prosecution lawyer Ralph Devlin QC proposing to take the full two weeks of available time to respond to new evidence in an "orderly fashion."
Defence lawyer Robert Bain QC brought up issues around insufficient exploration of witness testimony from three key witnesses.
Mr Devlin said he had not been made aware in any detail of one of the witnesses, an industrial engineer and formerly a specialist consultant to Linc Energy.
He was also vocal about the introduction of what he believed to be completely new information in open court, questioning the record of their correspondence.
"Can you make it clear that you're saying these things for the first time? I want correspondence referred to, in detail, because it looks as if the record reads as if the Crown has overlooked this," Mr Devlin said.
"I want him (Bain) to name specifically what has been said that even resembles what's been said in open court.
"I'm happy to look at it, happy to apply the decision of the court, but I don't want to be misquoted as to the state of my knowledge."
LNC Price at posting:
99.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
