100% redundancy is not cost effective. We would be paying hundreds of dollars on our bills for a "just in case" outage. Plants lie idle for 98% of the time and cannot be activated for a short outage of a few hours (except battery storage of course)
100% redundancy is not cost effective. We would be paying...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)