Totally correct! It depends so much on the context of the business that a simple glance at a P&L just won't cut it.
The ASX lists many relatively immature businesses who are still on their growth trajectory, which makes it much more of an art, as was mentioned by @bhavdip143 above.
However, a few things I'd look at...
- How much $ is going to corporate as opposed to actually growing the business? There are CEOs of micro-caps who are pocketing salaries that they're not earning.
- What is the growth rate of revenue v expenses?
- Is the business model proven - and just needs scaling - or is the offer of the company untested on the market?
Two companies that look good against these measures are Big Tin Can, and ReadCloud.
It'd be interesting to hear others' thoughts on this topic. What criteria do you look at?
- Forums
- IPOs
- Lets put an old argument to sleep!
Totally correct! It depends so much on the context of the...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BPH
BPH ENERGY LTD
David Breeze, MD & Executive Chairman
David Breeze
MD & Executive Chairman
SPONSORED BY The Market Online