Do we have any actual figures for cost of applying Alum compared with Phoslock?
you have suggested in your post here cost must be the limiting factor, but “what” cost?
Is Phoslock marginally, moderately or significantly more expensive to apply?
If marginal to even moderate thats exciting for us ( for if truly a superior product the US will look to swap, or as Phoslock grows they may be able to reduce price to compete) , but if significant, then it concerns me that maybe China may eventually turn to Alum if the cost of Phoslock is too much as they ramp up lake treatment.
Do we have any facts and figures at all re this cost comparison?
Cheers.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PET
- Lets Talk Potential
PET
phoslock environmental technologies limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
2.5¢

Lets Talk Potential, page-6
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.60M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PET (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Dr Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Dr Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online