Do we have any actual figures for cost of applying Alum compared with Phoslock?
you have suggested in your post here cost must be the limiting factor, but “what” cost?
Is Phoslock marginally, moderately or significantly more expensive to apply?
If marginal to even moderate thats exciting for us ( for if truly a superior product the US will look to swap, or as Phoslock grows they may be able to reduce price to compete) , but if significant, then it concerns me that maybe China may eventually turn to Alum if the cost of Phoslock is too much as they ramp up lake treatment.
Do we have any facts and figures at all re this cost comparison?
Cheers.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PET
- Lets Talk Potential
Lets Talk Potential, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 139 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
Add PET (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $15.60M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
PET (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable