For anyone who missed it, DJM suggested the company use a legal...

For anyone who missed it, DJM suggested the company use a legal process known as a "writ of mandamus".

@djm3001 On face value, I like it, and can see merit in it. The counter argument that I heard is that it would provide the JA with a valid reason to defer their decision until after the argument was heard and a decision handed down. If the case was lost, there would have been a lengthy delay (1+ years probably) to not obtain the outcome that it was designed to achieve. Personally I would like to think that the mere lodgement of such a writ would be sufficient to compel the JA to act, particularly with respect to the already elapsed time. This was just a conversation between a couple of shareholders, nothing to do with the company. People can form their own views as to the best way to proceed.