I disagree Simon. The letter was poorly written and ignored many...

I disagree Simon.

The letter was poorly written and ignored many facts. It was written for an already-sympathetic audience, who will no doubt lap it up (for they are being told what they want to hear).

John has had three major rallies into which he could have sold since he purchased his shares. Instead, his judgement told him to hold. I am sorry, but that it enough evidence for me to vote otherwise.

PS: I am taking about the letter and its contents. Please don't try to take my previous comments out of context.

To be open about it - most of those whinging are only doing do as they are sitting on large losses. Case of crying over spilt milk. Blame the directors if you must.

Not expecting you to agree.


Regards
Kit