Just for clarity - their “comprehensive nomination” is a form LGP themselves fill out spruiking (in under 2500 words) why they themselves should be “considered” for an award. “Considered” in exchange for cash mind you.
This sentence caught my eye:
”Any fees incurred to participate in the judging process (I.e travel to and from interview site for individuals) are the responsibility of the entrant” i.e LGP.
Impartial much?
It’s all here..
https://www.csia.com.au/awards
I kind of understand what you’re saying though I suppose - doesn’t matter how you get it - any publicity is good publicity.
LGP nominated for award, page-4
Add LGP (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $34.70M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.0¢ | 12.5¢ | 11.5¢ | $9.498K | 80.37K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 32352 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0¢ | 19921 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.005 ( 8.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 11.5¢ | 12.5¢ | 11.5¢ | 17136 | ||
| Last updated 14.20pm 06/06/2024 ? | |||||
| LGP (ASX) Chart |