Are you serious? asxdragonslayer just suggested that AGY could have a 3ktpa rather than 2ktpa process design, despite their announcements clearly identifying it as a 2ktpa operation.
A larger process design would clearly constitute information that a reasonable person would expect to have a material effect on the share price, noting that any technical grade production from the suggested additional 1ktpa would still achieve significant profit.
Therefore, if AGY failed to disclose a larger process design, that would constitute a significant ASX continuous disclosure breach.
Is that really that hard to understand?
Li-related News/Articles/Reports, page-1238
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7,516 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
