'Licence to discriminate': US watching same-sex wedding cake Supreme Court case closely, page-53

  1. 661 Posts.
    I'm confident that the Supreme Court will throw this out on the presumption that the bakers liberty is being violated by the gay couples appeal to the state to enforce a contract between two non-government parties. The right to choose what relationship you enter into is more important than enforcing non-discrimination. The gay couple should understand that if they can choose who they can and can't marry, then a baker has equal right to choose who he/she does business with.

    It's hypocrisy to expect the state to consent to your relationship while denying the right of others to make their own decisions.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.