Not avoiding the question at all. You made the claim. You back it up.
Post where I said refuse. Go on. Cut and paste where I said that .
You're desperately trying to spin it your way.
I notice how you don't want to talk about the contents of Shill-enberger's book. You just want to deflect the thread away from the facts it seems.
Have you watched the podcast yet by the way ? Have you read his articles ? Watched his TED talk ?
He's promoting his book. Why wouldn't he want more publicity ? His big claim is that he is apologising to the world . Why wouldn't he want a bigger platform, such as the mainstream media in Australia to share his message ? Why would he go to all this trouble and not try and get the biggest audience possible to hear his message .
Why wouldn't he do that ? Conspiracy maybe ?
Why wouldn't he complain on his podcast how he has asked to challenge all these people to a public debate on the facts ? Why wouldn't he call out these people who say he is fos.
Instead, he just goes on right wing, fossil funded podcasts.
Instead he ends up on SKY after dark. A well known right wing coolist haven.
That doesn't occur to you as a bit strange ?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lies, Damn lies and Climate Stats
Lies, Damn lies and Climate Stats, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 357 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)