In the interview with Jorden Peterson, Bjorn talked about how economists calculated the cost of global warming using the IPCC's worst case scenario at around 3% of GDP by 2100 but they expect global GDP to have risen by over 1000% by then.
The case for spending $billions trying to reduce CO2 didn't stack up as the return or bang for your buck was not worthwhile.
there was many other things that the money could be spent on that would give humanity a far greater return.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lies, Damn lies and Climate Stats
In the interview with Jorden Peterson, Bjorn talked about how...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 343 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)