Like your 94% imaginary recocery, page-22

Ok so here we go.
Heres how credible your references material is;

1) The date of publishing was 2015. However the reference material was collated well before this year
2) 2015 is of course encapsultes at best a Eurare attempt at recoveries. All well before Shenghes technical expertise was introduces in 2018 which increased this recovery value to an impressive 94%
3) The paper collates information, It has not undertaken any technical recoveries for itself
5) The report merely takes information FROM GGG and places it in a comparative chart. So the information you quote IS GGG supplied and is nothing new or conflicting as it is GGG owned, conducted and referred

This must be rather upsetting Im sure. But please just try and think it through before supplying information that clearly isnt relevant and is GGGs information anyway of which you claim not to ever refer to. You need to update your library. As its clearly redundant if this is the best you have to offer from it.