LTR 6.29% 67.0¢ liontown resources limited

Lithium Related Media Articles, page-23785

  1. 2,629 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 274
    Anatol - I hold a lot more LTR than I do PLS, but to label PLS as a high cost producer is a ridiculous statement imo.

    Yes, LTR will be producing at SC6.0, so a higher cost LTR operation can be as profitable, if not more profitable than PLS. However, PLS has a significant cost advantage, and I personally think that there is a reasonable chance that PLS will be the more profitable operation than LTR (the actual answer will depend imo on whether LTR can lock in a premium price for it's sustainable SC6.0 product which exceeds peers on a per lithium unit basis - let's wait and see where this lands when we receive actual pricing data received from the company). This is achievable, but is absolutely not a given. PLS has us covered on a scale basis, and their open pit operations + logistics to the port outperform Kathleen Valley unquestionably on a cost basis, even if Kathleen Valley has the better plant and product.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
67.0¢
Change
-0.045(6.29%)
Mkt cap ! $1.624B
Open High Low Value Volume
70.0¢ 71.0¢ 67.0¢ $10.52M 15.42M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
14 385809 66.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
67.5¢ 116000 4
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
LTR (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.