Lithium Related Media Articles, page-28021

@lostman

you are here clearly for downramping reason because you are doing the same what they are doing.

You said
"So it's a simple: Does the price of spod rise before we:
Need a CR.
Need a partner with more cash.
Go into care and maintenance."

LOL... This is you now. Not downramping?
These are the thing exactly what the downrampers bring here all the time.

It's made quite clear by the LTR management that no need for CR, no need for C&M. Yes LTR might make a JV in the industry.

Didn't you here these..?

Another thing what the downrampers like you try to do; "Let's discredit anatol because anatol is being a barrier in front of us, we can't demolish the retail holder base of LTR"

No, you are all wrong. As I always said people "DO YOUR OWN RESEARC, FOLLOW THE NEWS WELL, SEE THE EV AND BATTERY SALES"...

And many LTR holders here said that we are not following anatol, we do our won research.

Didn't you hear them?

Actually the real problem of you downrampers is that LTR holders are very well educated in the lithium industry. Constantly researching. We have many posters here making contribution.

Also you sound you are a Chinese, maybe from Mainland.
You said;
" Only time will tell and continuously complaining about the Chinese achieves nothing.
I'm afraid, for Australia, there is a lot of catching up required. This applies to most of the western world.

Investing in Africa can be risky for individuals. For one of the great world powers who can influence politically, financially, physically and absorb losses - not so. When your goal is not just a spod mine"

This is exactly a Chinese way of thinking. I've heard this many times from their mouth.
I have no intention to argue with a Chinese downramper here on HC threads.

I also said before;

"I'm putting all non-holders on ignore.
Even some of the posters who falsely states as "holder".
I have no time to struggle with these people's posts".