Hi Arthur great work
I think you just made a minor mistake with a decimal point, the Tianqi number is 2170.8 per ton using your calc, not 217.08
So it's 2170.80 for Tianqi vs 162 for PLS
And I note you used the lower range of the PLS exploration target tonnage and grade
Agree re using LCE
And many thanks to Superninja for this elegant table
Lithium Stock Comparison - Updated, page-30
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.41 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.257B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.38 | $2.48 | $2.32 | $71.74M | 29.70M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 186775 | $2.41 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.42 | 37066 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLS (ASX) Chart |