Are U Sure ? Why is that a significant pattern and not Pareidolia ? You have 3 points intersecting the bottom line of the flaggy thing pattern and 2 intersecting the top line out of 4 weeks x 5 days /week x 4 weeks per month = 80 days x 2 (daily highs and lows) =160 5/160 = 3.125% of all data to determine your pattern.
Is that really statistically significant ? If so what is the argument that it is statissuckalky significant? Are you really really really sure?
Don't feel bad, if you can't give me a full mathematical proof......After all I just used an hard encased, wet, bio pattern recognition device, which nobody quite knows how it works to pull a figure with no support other than I reckon so out of my rear end.
How do you think Mark Creasy does it?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
