If MFT was a separate Coy, I wonder whether MFS had failed to issue substantial shareholder notices saying they had a 16.9% interest in MFT. There's also the 19 staff there in "managerial" roles.
These relationships between MFT and MFS are incestuous to say the least. And they are not helped by the confusing names used for the Coys, their trusts and funds.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MFS
- litigation
MFS
mfs limited
litigation, page-16
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)