I apologise for the use of the word "idiot" .... that was not my best. you give me a fitting retort.
I've recognised since '98 that she provided a voice for many who are disaffected with politics and are mostly neglected, even by Howard.
yet she is crude and simplistic in her thinking, she doesn't have the capacity to understand important points of nuance or respect for evidence/proofs.
yes, I may be no better, and may be worse, as I can't see myself as others see me, just as it is with all of us. but I don't sit in Parliament where rational and educated thought is needed. and for this reason I do not see her as a viable person to be in parliament.
I do actually respect your right to see otherwise and to voice your opinion just as I share with you the same right.
