Live posts during AGM, page-151

yes it does concern me because if it was a decision not incompetence to essentially remove a group of shareholders from an AGM, whats the motivation?

I’m not surprised they didn’t do a Q&A. Care factor zero. But they didn’t need to turn off the mic to achieve that.
What was 100% predictable was that Retail holders sell cheap when they get angry. Which they did and look at the price.

I’ve been buying since 2c and the only thing I care about is the end takeover price - which won’t be fantastic if this is sold off cheap to ‘strategic stakeholders’.
IMO