Still can't work out how you can interpret all this so wrongly...

Still can't work out how you can interpret all this so wrongly IMO. There was some high grade results but not enough and more importantly not the thicknesses that would have made the difference. Nearology we have with for sure with HAS but no guarantees that we have their thicknesses and grades. The only ones pumping the hell out of this was the traders. Did they miss their mark? Facts are they mostly intercepted the units they were after. Yes, they missed some as well but they got out a resource statement. Could they have kept the market more informed? Most likely, but we will probably never know. We would be at 0.6c or thereabouts now anyway.

I'm 100% sure that Davis and Brian feel gutted over the results just like all us holders. They just don't want to admit that and sound weak. They tried and were hoping for better. As for demanding justification for crap results, perhaps DG, look at yourself in the mirror. Maybe punting on high risk exploration was never for you. The board has some hard decisions to make so give them a little time. The signs are positive that they are not about to fold getting another director on board.