Am I right to think a breach of the lending covenants requires an asx announcement? It would be self evident if it has occured. We have a new CFO and E and Y guy who come with reputations I can't see that they would put Sgh before their own responsibilities.
I have reflected elsewhere but just to state again at June 30 there were 55000 nhil files , 110000 essentially rta files within Sgs with a view to adding 77000 and settling 70000 in 2016 plus some nhil files. So assuming half the 70000 files settled in the first half which in itself is inprobable , that is the sum total of inflows into sgs.
So bleeding cash , yes. But that's a hell of a lot of files progressing. So that's the task of the CFO to demonstrate the outflows are less than the change in Wip.
I think he maybe starting with a new bit of paper.
I am still puzzled by PwC having their knees under the desk. I just wonder if there maybe a tie to the warranty provided by Quindell. I assume any claim on the warranty sums ( 200 million with 100 million held in escrow) would require evidence of support. Pwc maybe seen to be agreeable to both parties. Just speculation.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SGH
- Loading up the truck
Loading up the truck, page-637
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,879 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online