Local opposition, page-53

Hello again.

The distance measurements on the map have a serious error, and it is that it is measured towards the "historic center" of the city, and not towards the already inhabited and functioning area, such as the new Cáceres hospital or the university campus.



One question ... is the company transparent about its judicial and administrative problems? It has already been sanctioned by the regional government for carrying out actions without permission and without environmental reports.

About administrative sanctions against the company: https://www.elperiodicoextremadura.com/noticias/caceres/junta-ratifica-sancion-empresa-minera-sus-obras-ilegales-valdeflores_1215761.html

They have also received a Court sentence against, due to the performance of actions outside the legality: https://www.hoy.es/caceres/juez-obliga-infinity-20200921193712-nt.html

And I think it has more open processes, and more serious.

The main European party, which leads the European Commission (European Popular Party) has expressed its opposition to the project due to environmental risks. The source is the website of the party itself in Europe: https://www.eppgroup.eu/es/como-trabajamos/con-los-paises-de-la-ue/espana/noticias/pp-se-opone-en-parlamento-europeo-a-mina-de-litio-en-caceres

In fact, in the European Parliament, all groups have backed the platform that opposes the project, to facilitate better investigation of the consequences, independently of the interests of the company: https://www.publico.es/internacional/mina-litio-eurocamara-apoya-plataforma-quiere-frenar-mina-litio-caceres.html

The European Commission has conditioned its support for the mine on the basis of social support. There will be no mine without the support of citizens, says the Commission: https://www.hoy.es/caceres/comision-europea-afirma-20200904224947-nt.html

Nothing is clear. It's not about 'a mine'... is about who, how, when and why want this kind of mine in this moment.