Localised sea level rises?, page-68

  1. 5,114 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 60
    "This article suggests that your 97% is at best just 1%!"

    Here is an extract of the analysis of the tripe from WUWT. More detail at http://blog.disallowed link.com/2013/07/whos-lying-now-its-brandon.html
    Who's lying now? It's Brandon Shollenberger on WUWT

    Brandon Shollenberger is trying to imply that Cook et al 97% included abstracts that suggest it's just a little bit of warming that we're causing. That's a lie. He's building on recent statements by some of the denialiati that they are part of the 97% who think humans cause at least some global warming. But unless those deniers accept that humans cause most (at least 50%) of global warming, then they are part of the 3% deniers not the 97%.

    All similar studies point to the same thing. It's not as if the Cook et al study came up with a different result. Every single study looking at the subject have found that around 97% of papers and/or scientists who research this topic agree that humans are now causing most of the global warming. It's only deniers (not scientists) like those who frequent WUWT who disagree...............................................................
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.