No you've got it wrong. What you are saying is that random walk is the thing. Based on that, you must accept Black-Scholes probabilities that the stocks will go below a certain point in a certain time. Depending on volatilities, that probability might be greater than 0.5, but it is probably a lot less.
So if random walk holds, then the chance that I can make accurate predictions consistently using head and shoulders is very low, tending to zero according to the number of predictions I make and how far out of the money they are. Eventually, the probability that I am just a lucky guesser will fall to one in a zillion - and as I wont be making any money I'll give up long before that.
But you have to start somewhere, and four confirmed H&S was a good place.
But you know, you should have accepted that bet, because both BHP and BBG had only been below the neckline for a couple of days, not long enough for a proper confirmation - and now they have jumped back up again so I have to withdraw them from the list.
Anyway, it will be worth keeping an eye on the predictions - if they are hopelessly wrong, you will be able to say I told you so.
- Forums
- ASX - General
- Lochend and Glen - put money where mouth is
No you've got it wrong. What you are saying is that random walk...
Featured News
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit