Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

LOCKDOWN LUNACY, page-86

First 86 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
madamswer

16,448 Posts.

8016

04/08/20

00:50

Post #: 46278215
Share

Originally posted by pintohoo ↑

you take the position very clearly that there’s no immunity

you must realise that you are dealing with people with poor reading comprehension

Look at the result when WHO came out in ?? Jan or Feb. and said that there was no evidence or no clear evidence of Covid being airborne

- something like that

they went on to explain - as you insist on explaining fully - that more tests were necessary

they actually inferred that they expected to find that it was airborne.

However

the message that the boneheads got was that

WHO told us it wasn’t airborne.

Easy - send the message

Assume this thing IS airborne - until otherwise informed..

In other words —- assume the worst position.

Expand

So, by inference, when the WHO says immunity has not been proven or unproven, you unilaterally assume there is no immunity?

Mmmmwwhahaha!!

One can’t write comedy scripts such as this.
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 2,139 more messages in this thread...

First 86 Last