You suggest that AVZ has not been transparent with its shareholders, which isn't a revelation given our suspension over disclosure issues.
However, you seem to hint at something more serious. You claim that Nigel would rather “burn down the house” than relinquish power and have his secrets exposed.
Instead of making cryptic remarks, could you please clarify what you believe he might be concealing?
AVZ Price at posting:
78.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
