You suggest that AVZ has not been transparent with its shareholders, which isn't a revelation given our suspension over disclosure issues.
However, you seem to hint at something more serious. You claim that Nigel would rather “burn down the house” than relinquish power and have his secrets exposed.
Instead of making cryptic remarks, could you please clarify what you believe he might be concealing?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Locke Funding Almost Certainly Dead In The Water If News Article is Correct
You suggest that AVZ has not been transparent with its...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 173 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)