Logical Snapshot, page-4

Bit confusing there soj88 and the position of the decimal points.
"Off course you can throw more money at .1 or .2 cents, but than you are no different to a problem gambler, who thinks that once, all will come good one day and keep hitting the buy button.
There are help centres for this off course.
My expectation is, that there will be a small pump"

That encourages me, because that's EXACTLY why some people, like me, were buying @ .001 and .002. That "expectation" of yours would produce at least a 50% windfall or even 100%, just with that "small pump" that YOU expect!!
Can't wait, and would also be a double win, because will have reduced the overall cost and instead of sitting around rubbishing people for "chasing a carrot" as Fred puts it and being a "problem gambler" as you put it, the only ones with a problem will be those who sell at a loss, and using YOUR "expectation", that won't be those that buy @ .001 and .002!!!.
I've already sold all of those that I bought @ .001 which has slashed my average and need just that "small pump" that YOU expect to make it an extremely profitable play overall. I'm punting that YOU are right!!
This is purely a punters stock and they are the "risks" that punters take quite willingly, otherwise, they are not true punters, but, sad dreamers.

BHP has to go from $30 to $60 for a 100% profit, "some of us" now only need to see .003 and .004 for the same result.
I'm very encouraged by this new mob at RRS and that Q&A segment is a very valuable addition especially for CTR holders while RRS are involved. What they do with that 200 million shares IF the get them, having a RRS Director on the CTR Board, what factors they use to determine if they exit CTR. ALL of those are significant catalysts for CTR's SP.

My comment re Sara's departure from CTR was based on what was said on this forum at that time and deservedly so, regardless what she "might have" said about C17. Divulging ANY price sensitive stuff to an individual shareholder over the phone by a person in her position is totally unacceptable and warranted her leaving, under any circumstances.
I, in no way, am agreeing with what was alleged to have been said in that post on HC and my latest comment relates to Sara's position at RRS, which she has held since April last year, and BEFORE she left CTR, and has "survived" a total clean out of former senior personnel. She must be doing something right!!
How many of you are going to put in questions to that RRS Q&A, or just stay in CTR's forum to hypothesize till the cows come home?