Logical Snapshot, page-9

soj88. Something's been bugging me since I read your post and now see so many TUs in support.
You said, "but then you are no different to a problem gambler, who thinks that once all will come good one day and keep hitting the buy button."

Firstly, you are putting fair dinkum, active ST and day traders in the same category as "problem gamblers". That is offensive in the extreme. Many people, and I'd bet a large percentage of HC's 250,000 members, would fall into your description.
Secondly, since early September, you have posted around 140 times just on CTR and on every post your sentiment has been to "hold". You have told all of your numerous supporters and readers that your sentiment for the last 4 months has been to "hold" and during that time you have lambasted CTR and RRS in the vast majority of those posts and during that time you have said to hold while, despite your disparaging views on this company and its management, the S.P. has dropped from .008 to .001.

I simply cannot for the life of me understand how you can support that sentiment and yet accuse those that do trade with "pips" as "problem gamblers". IMO, that attitude IS a problem, as you also state that you think, "expect", that "all will come good" by both "holding" and also "expecting" a spike, but, still admit that even with that "expected" spike you also expect to make a loss and that you "will make good use of it". "Make good use of it", but, expect to make a loss??

It's just so confusing that you make these conflicting posts and that so many others support them.
Maybe, to help your supporters, you could tell them which company you were successful with to have recovered your losses on CTR and whose management is so superior. The least you can do after telling all of those readers that your sentiment was to hold while the S.P. has plummeted 87%.
Wasn't RMP was it??