LOI extension - pros and cons, page-75

So Jack, SYR are using wine giveaway's to distract any fundamental or technical truths about Syrah. Like -why did their Chairman Tom Eadie and MD Paul Kehoe leave in the last year or two? Why did their long awaited DFS come out the day after TON's AGM? A diversion to impact TON?? Why after every TON ann. do we get a swarm of negative and "concerned" posters who do not hold TON? What are they afraid of?
King Louie has long used the same sand pit description to query why SYR and TON should be valued so differently. I read a post from Mainholm - 15381180 on 30/5 in which he described in technical language that their deposits are in fact different.----"-the SYR deposit underwent metamorphic facies at the grade of Granulite and upper Amphibote. TON's Balama North location only shows it underwent a Amphibolite metamorphic facies. " Mainholm not surprisingly says therefore the SYR deposit is better. However BB was quoted at the AGM that he had doubts about the SYR deposit. The TON deposit is of slightly higher grade and of course larger. But the big difference is that SYR has not shown their graphite to be expandable whereas TON's graphite has been expanded up to 1000 times in the Lab and attracted an enormous binding offtake agreement and 2 JV's from a large Chinese company specialising in expandable graphite. So sorry Mainholm, if they are different sandpits then TON got the best one.