London still remains main driver of Patersons Area, page-20

Do you know what stops all this craziness answers to questions asked by shareholders, a clear strategy forward and revenue. outlining vague details on drilling CC, getting to the MoZ and then piggy backing off the success of pattersons isn't a strategy. Everything we have heard are just tactics within a strategy, we have never heard the defining strategy which we are owed. I feel like we are being kept in the dark a little, these are supposed to exciting times, let us be excited with you and help you promote what is happening at ARV.

A clear strategy will define the tactics to achieve the strategy. A clearer strategy would include words like, Production, costs, team, marketing, staff, Capital Raises, Divestment, cash flow, AISC, Agreements, Licenses, Timelines.

"Eg We aim to be revenue producing by Year X, Moving X amount of tonnes through RH with an AISC of X, after we have completed X,Y,Z on making RH work. We also need to ensure we have X licenses in place, all of this will help us to become one of the lower cost Gold, Copper, Cobalt producers within the Pilbara. The first steps are Drilling, the second is a PFS, third is raising funds through this channel or that channel if needed. We plan on diversifying X assets because of these reasons A,B,C to give us some better cash flow so we can stop the dilution"

I want this company to succeed, they have awesome assets we know this. What is your strategy though, how will you get RH up and running, how will you change some shareholder sentiment and perception, what are your ideas around the other assets. What is the path to near term cash flow like Ed believes is around the corner.

This is just my understanding and knowledge of Tactics Vs Strategies and business in general, DYOR