look who was right, page-16

Wallygog

what you have posted

'the 2D SEISMIC ....... SOME of the major lines were redone to under 4kl' ..... and MANY under 2kl.'

Note the uppercase I added.

which in fact concurred with me that the 2D seismic was done 2-10k apart.

Just look at the Seismic map lines with scale.

You guys are trying to ramp up the stock by using the unproven and prospective resource 'TARGETS' or LEADS figures from the NSAI/ISIS/WHN reports as if they have ACTUALLY found that much oil!

As a comparison, the entire ocean floor on earth could be all with P10 resources.

FYI, The dark patches are the non solid pockets. They could be oil, gas, bubbles, water, air, mud.

The previous 2 exploration wells done in the 80s didn't find commercial oil. There is no gaurantee that these 'pockets' are actual oil. They COULD be oil, possibly 10% chance that it has oil. or we DO NOY KNOW for sure just yet.

So don't post as if you actually KNOW there is oil in these exploration targets. Until then, stop telling everyone they have billions of barrel of resource. These are LEADS, based on the VOLUME of these soft pockets under the ocean bed rock.


and stop trying to shut up everyone that express a different opinion and with different understanding on HC.

And don't believe for a moment posts on HC will have an effect on the SP.

DYOR