The R value is rarely used when testing people, as these tests use CT.
In all honesty, I do not trust using CT.
Is CT being used to cover up the actual R value of the un-vaccinated verses the vaccinated ?
Prognostic Value of “Cycle Threshold” in Confirmed COVID ...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7991767
Objective: To study the correlation between the cycle threshold (
CT) of reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test in confirmed COVID-19 patients and the severity of disease. Background: RT–PCR test is a standard method for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. This test is based upon the amplification of the ...
So R value testing has been frown out the door for CT testing, can these tests be trusted ?
Only the virus R value is tested, not R value of vaccinated and un-vaccinated people, why ?
The R value and growth rate - GOV.UK
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-r-value-and-growth-rate
- State of The UK Epidemic
- Latest R and Growth Rate For England
- Other Key Statistics
- About R and Growth Rate
- An Rvalue between 0.8 and 1.1 means that, on average, every 10 people infected will infect between 8 and 11 other people. A growth rate of between -3% and 1% means that the number of new infections could be broadly flat, shrinking by up to 3% every day, or growing by up to 1% every day. These estimates represent the transmission of COVID-192 to 3 weeks ago, due to the time delay between someone being infected, developing symptoms, and needing healthcare.
See more on gov.uk
Seems like there could be some kind of cover up.
