I don't understand why it is considered downramping to highlight...

I don't understand why it is considered downramping to highlight the painfully obvious behaviours of a couple of the directors. With transparency the likely hood that they think they can get away with these actions in the future if more people have eyes to know what to look for.

Let's just not fool ourselves into thinking that TS has done anything for CFE/CLE for over a decade, not made a single cent for anyone other than himself. Don't be fooled by the headline numbers when he will quickly dilute you to nothing given the chance - watch for a JV spin off and float announcement or the even more subtle lease for way over market for property owned by TS that in fact has no staff (according to financial statements).

Downramping, no. Transparency yes.